Triple

T15139055
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Missouri Courts of Appeals E361633 entity
Predicate subjectToReviewProcedure P117472 FINISHED
Object transfer to Supreme Court of Missouri LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: transfer to Supreme Court of Missouri | Statement: [Missouri Courts of Appeals, subjectToReviewProcedure, transfer to Supreme Court of Missouri]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subjectToReviewProcedure
Context triple: [Missouri Courts of Appeals, subjectToReviewProcedure, transfer to Supreme Court of Missouri]
  • A. reviewedBy
    Indicates that an item, work, or action has been examined and evaluated by a specific agent or reviewer.
  • B. reviewedFor
    Indicates that one entity has examined or evaluated another entity for a specific purpose, standard, or context.
  • C. cannotReview
    Indicates that an entity is not permitted or able to perform a review of another entity or item.
  • D. requiresAssessmentBy
    Indicates that one entity must be formally evaluated, reviewed, or judged by another specified entity before proceeding or being accepted.
  • E. reviewedAs
    Indicates that one entity has evaluated, critiqued, or assessed another entity in a particular capacity, role, or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a06450081909c5a14ea9851a15e completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e005b59b488190b0016970647e7483 completed April 15, 2026, 9:40 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69deb9713fe881909dec2fd3f6c84b39 completed April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69dec71e8dcc81908badc834b6ccf273 completed April 14, 2026, 11 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:07 a.m.