Triple

T15124644
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject MLA E361255 entity
Predicate usedInJurisdictionType P105320 FINISHED
Object provincial legislature LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: provincial legislature | Statement: [MLA, usedInJurisdictionType, provincial legislature]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedInJurisdictionType
Context triple: [MLA, usedInJurisdictionType, provincial legislature]
  • A. usesJurisdictionType chosen
    Indicates that one entity applies, operates under, or is governed by a particular type or category of jurisdiction.
  • B. hasJurisdictionalUse
    Indicates that an entity has legal authority or recognized usage rights within a specific jurisdiction or territorial scope.
  • C. usesJurisdiction
    Indicates that one entity applies or operates under the legal authority or rules of a particular jurisdiction.
  • D. existsInJurisdiction
    Indicates that an entity is located within, falls under, or is subject to the authority of a particular legal or administrative jurisdiction.
  • E. definedJurisdictionOf
    Indicates that one entity formally establishes or specifies the scope, boundaries, or authority of another entity’s jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a06450081909c5a14ea9851a15e completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e005a0c6888190840de4ead2306544 completed April 15, 2026, 9:39 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69deb96c1d9c81909351558ed97bc5b7 completed April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:06 a.m.