Triple
T15116186
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yancowinna County |
E361044
|
entity |
| Predicate | landAdministrationSystem |
P117380
|
FINISHED |
| Object | cadastral system of New South Wales |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: cadastral system of New South Wales | Statement: [Yancowinna County, landAdministrationSystem, cadastral system of New South Wales]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: landAdministrationSystem Context triple: [Yancowinna County, landAdministrationSystem, cadastral system of New South Wales]
-
A.
landPolicy
Indicates a relationship where an authority defines or applies rules governing the ownership, use, management, or distribution of land.
-
B.
landTenure
Indicates the type, conditions, or rights under which land is held, used, or owned by an entity.
-
C.
seaTenureSystem
Indicates a system governing rights, access, and control over the use and management of marine or sea areas.
-
D.
landGrantField
Indicates that a specific field or parcel of land has been allocated or granted, typically by an authority, to a recipient under a land grant arrangement.
-
E.
hasLandAllotmentDescribedIn
Indicates that an entity’s land allotment is specified or detailed in a particular document or description.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a0491ec8190830960be8fafb994 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0059ca9048190b742e70e818ee64f |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deb96c1d9c81909351558ed97bc5b7 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69dec71e8dcc81908badc834b6ccf273 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:05 a.m.