Triple
T15100702
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Krakolye |
E360655
|
entity |
| Predicate | statusOfAssociatedLanguage |
P25828
|
FINISHED |
| Object | endangered |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: endangered | Statement: [Krakolye, statusOfAssociatedLanguage, endangered]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusOfAssociatedLanguage Context triple: [Krakolye, statusOfAssociatedLanguage, endangered]
-
A.
hasLanguageStatus
chosen
Indicates that an entity has a particular status or condition regarding its language use, recognition, or classification.
-
B.
officialLanguageStatusSharedWith
Indicates that two entities share at least one official language in common.
-
C.
closelyAssociatedLanguage
Indicates that one language is closely connected to another, such as through frequent co-use, mutual influence, or strong cultural or regional association.
-
D.
linkedToLanguage
Indicates that an entity has an association or connection with a specific language, such as being expressed in, related to, or dependent on that language.
-
E.
ethnicLanguageStatus
Indicates the status or role of a language in relation to a particular ethnic group (e.g., primary, secondary, heritage, or minority language).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a0491ec8190830960be8fafb994 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e00550007481909e02ee1d597a4d37 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deb96c1d9c81909351558ed97bc5b7 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:04 a.m.