Triple

T15100233
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Unigenitus (1343 bull) E360643 entity
Predicate hasCanonicalSignificance P117321 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Unigenitus (1343 bull), hasCanonicalSignificance, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCanonicalSignificance
Context triple: [Unigenitus (1343 bull), hasCanonicalSignificance, yes]
  • A. hasCanonicalRelevance
    Indicates that something is considered standard, authoritative, or centrally important within an established canon or reference framework.
  • B. hasSignificant
    Indicates that one entity possesses or exhibits a level of importance, impact, or relevance that is notably large or meaningful in relation to another entity or context.
  • C. hasCanonicalRepresentation
    Indicates that one entity is the standard or authoritative form in which another entity is represented.
  • D. hasCanonicalNumber
    Indicates that an entity is associated with its officially recognized or standard reference number.
  • E. hasCanonicalTerm
    Indicates that one term in a set is designated as the standard or authoritative form used to represent a concept or entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a035aa88190b52a139d3a1b7b6d completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e00550007481909e02ee1d597a4d37 completed April 15, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69deb9645b9c8190a5712456dbd78029 completed April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69dec71e8dcc81908badc834b6ccf273 completed April 14, 2026, 11 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:04 a.m.