Triple
T15093070
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Federal Rule of Evidence 1007 |
E360468
|
entity |
| Predicate | evidentiaryCategory |
P3168
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rule on proof of contents |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rule on proof of contents | Statement: [Federal Rule of Evidence 1007, evidentiaryCategory, rule on proof of contents]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: evidentiaryCategory Context triple: [Federal Rule of Evidence 1007, evidentiaryCategory, rule on proof of contents]
-
A.
usedEvidenceType
chosen
Indicates that a particular type or category of evidence was employed or relied upon in a given context or activity.
-
B.
providesEvidenceFor
Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
-
C.
excludesFromEvidence
Indicates that something is intentionally omitted or disallowed from being considered as evidence in a given context.
-
D.
hasEvidentials
Indicates that a statement, claim, or information is accompanied by markers specifying the type or source of evidence supporting it.
-
E.
appliesRulesOfEvidence
Indicates that one party enforces or follows established rules of evidence in relation to another party or proceeding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a035aa88190b52a139d3a1b7b6d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0027925788190b955fdc6626adf7d |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deb9645b9c8190a5712456dbd78029 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:04 a.m.