Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Federal Rule of Evidence 1003 | Statement: [Federal Rule of Evidence 1007, relatedTo, Federal Rule of Evidence 1003]

Target entity: Federal Rule of Evidence 1003
Context triple: [Federal Rule of Evidence 1007, relatedTo, Federal Rule of Evidence 1003]

• A. Federal Rule of Evidence 1003 chosen
  Federal Rule of Evidence 1003 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that permits the use of duplicates in place of original writings, recordings, or photographs unless a genuine question is raised about the original’s authenticity or it would be unfair to admit the duplicate.
• B. Federal Rule of Evidence 1002
  Federal Rule of Evidence 1002 is the “best evidence” rule that generally requires the original writing, recording, or photograph to prove its content in court.
• C. Federal Rule of Evidence 1006
  Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows parties to present the contents of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs in the form of summaries, charts, or calculations when the originals would be too cumbersome to examine in court.
• D. Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 603
  Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 603 is the U.S. evidentiary rule that requires witnesses to take an oath or affirmation to testify truthfully before giving evidence in court.
• E. Federal Rule of Evidence 1001
  Federal Rule of Evidence 1001 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that defines key terms governing the admissibility and handling of writings, recordings, and photographs in court.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.