Triple
T15093048
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Federal Rule of Evidence 1007 |
E360468
|
entity |
| Predicate | methodOfProof |
P7024
|
FINISHED |
| Object | testimony of the party against whom the evidence is offered |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: testimony of the party against whom the evidence is offered | Statement: [Federal Rule of Evidence 1007, methodOfProof, testimony of the party against whom the evidence is offered]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: methodOfProof Context triple: [Federal Rule of Evidence 1007, methodOfProof, testimony of the party against whom the evidence is offered]
-
A.
standardOfProof
Indicates the level or degree of certainty required to establish that a claim or allegation is true in a given context.
-
B.
stanceOnProofs
Indicates the position or attitude an entity holds regarding the use, value, or nature of proofs.
-
C.
hasProofMethod
chosen
Indicates that there exists a specific method or technique used to establish or demonstrate the validity of something (such as a statement, claim, or theorem).
-
D.
providesEvidenceFor
Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
-
E.
hasAlternativeProofMethod
Indicates that there exists a different proof technique or approach that can be used to establish the same result or theorem.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a035aa88190b52a139d3a1b7b6d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0027925788190b955fdc6626adf7d |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deb9645b9c8190a5712456dbd78029 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:04 a.m.