Triple

T15093021
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 E360467 entity
Predicate citationForm P4468 FINISHED
Object Fed. R. Evid. 1006 E360467 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fed. R. Evid. 1006 | Statement: [Federal Rule of Evidence 1006, citationForm, Fed. R. Evid. 1006]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Fed. R. Evid. 1006
Context triple: [Federal Rule of Evidence 1006, citationForm, Fed. R. Evid. 1006]
  • A. Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 chosen
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows parties to present the contents of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs in the form of summaries, charts, or calculations when the originals would be too cumbersome to examine in court.
  • B. Federal Rule of Evidence 1002
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1002 is the “best evidence” rule that generally requires the original writing, recording, or photograph to prove its content in court.
  • C. Federal Rule of Evidence 1003
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1003 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that permits the use of duplicates in place of original writings, recordings, or photographs unless a genuine question is raised about the original’s authenticity or it would be unfair to admit the duplicate.
  • D. Federal Rule of Evidence 1001
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1001 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that defines key terms governing the admissibility and handling of writings, recordings, and photographs in court.
  • E. Federal Rule of Evidence 806
    Federal Rule of Evidence 806 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that governs how and when a hearsay declarant’s credibility may be attacked or supported as if the declarant had testified in court.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a035aa88190b52a139d3a1b7b6d completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e0027925788190b955fdc6626adf7d completed April 15, 2026, 9:26 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69feae1f406081909d4925474370da86 completed May 9, 2026, 3:46 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:04 a.m.