Triple
T15082253
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jonathan Penrose |
E360176
|
entity |
| Predicate | playedStyle |
P3775
|
FINISHED |
| Object | positional |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: positional | Statement: [Jonathan Penrose, playedStyle, positional]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: playedStyle Context triple: [Jonathan Penrose, playedStyle, positional]
-
A.
styleOfPlay
chosen
Indicates the characteristic manner or approach in which an entity performs or behaves, especially in a game, sport, or artistic context.
-
B.
performanceStyle
Indicates the manner or style in which an action, work, or performance is carried out or presented.
-
C.
playType
Indicates the specific category or style of play or performance associated with an event or action.
-
D.
playedFormat
Indicates that an entity (such as a game, show, or media content) is or was presented, delivered, or experienced in a particular format (such as digital, physical, live, or specific media type).
-
E.
playstyleWeakness
Indicates a relationship where one playstyle is particularly vulnerable or disadvantaged when facing another playstyle.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a035aa88190b52a139d3a1b7b6d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0027450a48190a84588b6aaf84ebf |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deb9645b9c8190a5712456dbd78029 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:03 a.m.