Triple
T15078618
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nelson, Nevada |
E380074
|
entity |
| Predicate | declineOfMining |
P41756
|
FINISHED |
| Object | early 20th century |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: early 20th century | Statement: [Nelson, Nevada, declineOfMining, early 20th century]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: declineOfMining Context triple: [Nelson, Nevada, declineOfMining, early 20th century]
-
A.
movementDecline
Indicates a reduction or worsening in the extent, frequency, or effectiveness of movement or mobility over time.
-
B.
declineIn
Indicates a relationship where one entity experiences a decrease or reduction in the level, amount, or intensity of another entity over time.
-
C.
hasIndustryDecline
chosen
Indicates that an entity is experiencing or associated with a reduction or downturn in its industry’s performance or activity.
-
D.
decline
Indicates a decrease or reduction in the level, amount, quality, or intensity of something over time.
-
E.
decliningAs
Indicates that one entity is decreasing in value, intensity, or importance relative to another over time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cd7683881908d405c1b5d7b4f7f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dff7fe5a208190823900b25e298dab |
completed | April 15, 2026, 8:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deb9645b9c8190a5712456dbd78029 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:03 a.m.