Triple
T15074056
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Blue Hall |
E379952
|
entity |
| Predicate | originalDesignIncluded |
P1529
|
FINISHED |
| Object | blue wall tiles |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: blue wall tiles | Statement: [Blue Hall, originalDesignIncluded, blue wall tiles]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: originalDesignIncluded Context triple: [Blue Hall, originalDesignIncluded, blue wall tiles]
-
A.
hasDesign
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses, embodies, or is characterized by a particular design associated with another entity.
-
B.
hasDesignOrigin
Indicates that one entity is the source, inspiration, or original model from which the design of another entity is derived.
-
C.
currentDesign
Indicates that an entity is the presently active or most up-to-date design associated with another entity or context.
-
D.
designedWith
Indicates that one entity was created, planned, or developed using another entity as a tool, method, or guiding basis in its design process.
-
E.
designsFor
Indicates that one entity creates or plans something specifically intended to serve, suit, or be used by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cd7683881908d405c1b5d7b4f7f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dff7fa0570819088a97b28173154cd |
completed | April 15, 2026, 8:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deb95a182081908fffc4402b02a394 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:02 a.m.