Triple

T15062415
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Max Hodak E379661 entity
Predicate usesSocialMediaFor P20322 FINISHED
Object discussing technology LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: discussing technology | Statement: [Max Hodak, usesSocialMediaFor, discussing technology]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesSocialMediaFor
Context triple: [Max Hodak, usesSocialMediaFor, discussing technology]
  • A. socialMedia chosen
    Indicates a relationship where one entity uses, is associated with, or interacts through social networking or content-sharing platforms with another entity.
  • B. mediaUse
    Indicates that an entity makes use of, consumes, or engages with a particular medium or media resource.
  • C. hasSocialService
    Indicates that an entity provides, offers, or is associated with a social service to another entity or community.
  • D. hasSocialEngagement
    Indicates that an entity participates in or maintains some form of social interaction, activity, or relationship with others.
  • E. socialMediaPlatformAssociatedWith
    Indicates that there is an association or linkage between an entity and a specific social media platform.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85cd7683881908d405c1b5d7b4f7f completed April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dedee6a55c8190b40c4672fb46b79b completed April 15, 2026, 12:42 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69deb95a182081908fffc4402b02a394 completed April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:02 a.m.