Triple

T15050015
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Golden Meadow E379334 entity
Predicate associatedWithLanguageArea P29819 FINISHED
Object German-speaking regions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: German-speaking regions | Statement: [Golden Meadow, associatedWithLanguageArea, German-speaking regions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithLanguageArea
Context triple: [Golden Meadow, associatedWithLanguageArea, German-speaking regions]
  • A. belongsToLinguisticRegion
    Indicates that one linguistic entity (such as a language, dialect, or speech variety) is associated with or situated within a particular linguistic region or area.
  • B. languageArea chosen
    Indicates the geographic or cultural region in which a particular language is used or predominantly spoken.
  • C. linkedToLanguage
    Indicates that an entity has an association or connection with a specific language, such as being expressed in, related to, or dependent on that language.
  • D. alsoInLanguageRegion
    Indicates that two or more entities are located within or associated with the same language-defined geographic region.
  • E. linguisticArea
    Indicates a regional context in which languages share features due to geographic proximity and contact rather than common genetic origin.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85cd64d108190853797a95c11cc45 completed April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69deda8f71988190b4fe7f7de4ccb798 completed April 15, 2026, 12:23 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de9a69d7848190b2b4662dd30f20e9 completed April 14, 2026, 7:50 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:01 a.m.