Triple

T15036056
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Matthew Waterhouse E378478 entity
Predicate hasNotabilityPeriod P116486 FINISHED
Object early 1980s LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: early 1980s | Statement: [Matthew Waterhouse, hasNotabilityPeriod, early 1980s]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotabilityPeriod
Context triple: [Matthew Waterhouse, hasNotabilityPeriod, early 1980s]
  • A. hasNotableRecordingPeriod
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific time span during which notable recording activity took place.
  • B. hasNotabilityNote
    Indicates that there is an associated note or annotation explaining the significance, prominence, or special relevance of the subject.
  • C. hasNotabilityCategory
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular category that characterizes its type or area of notability.
  • D. hasNotabilityOrigin
    Indicates that an entity’s notability or prominence arises from, or is primarily associated with, a specified origin (such as a place, context, or source).
  • E. hasReviewPeriod
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific time span during which it is subject to review or evaluation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85cd46b2c819090d054c27787f677 completed April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ded82b29948190acda49cbec3f927a completed April 15, 2026, 12:13 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de9a67cbc481909c19c2de57de4eb7 completed April 14, 2026, 7:50 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69deb1a88d588190996afa8e5b32b552 completed April 14, 2026, 9:29 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:59 a.m.