Triple
T15027191
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yakama Nation |
E378247
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTreatyRight |
P116439
|
FINISHED |
| Object | fishing rights on the Columbia River |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fishing rights on the Columbia River | Statement: [Yakama Nation, hasTreatyRight, fishing rights on the Columbia River]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTreatyRight Context triple: [Yakama Nation, hasTreatyRight, fishing rights on the Columbia River]
-
A.
hasMainTreaty
Indicates that one entity is the primary or principal treaty associated with another entity.
-
B.
treatyPower
Indicates that one entity holds the authority or capacity to negotiate, conclude, or be bound by treaties with another entity.
-
C.
establishedByTreatyOrAct
Indicates that the relationship or entity was formally created, defined, or authorized through a specific treaty or legislative act.
-
D.
hasSovereignRightsHolder
Indicates that one entity holds the sovereign rights or ultimate legal authority over another entity, such as a territory, resource, or jurisdiction.
-
E.
hasNoSingleTreaty
Indicates that there is no single, unified treaty governing the relationship between the entities, implying multiple or fragmented agreements instead.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cd46b2c819090d054c27787f677 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ded7dfcb508190aec8cd667e27a8ea |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de9a67cbc481909c19c2de57de4eb7 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:50 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69deb1a88d588190996afa8e5b32b552 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:58 a.m.