Triple

T15005964
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mount Morgan E377711 entity
Predicate heritageFeatures P27481 FINISHED
Object historic commercial buildings LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: historic commercial buildings | Statement: [Mount Morgan, heritageFeatures, historic commercial buildings]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: heritageFeatures
Context triple: [Mount Morgan, heritageFeatures, historic commercial buildings]
  • A. hasHeritageFeature chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses or includes a feature recognized as part of cultural, historical, or natural heritage.
  • B. heritageType
    Indicates the classification of an entity’s cultural or natural heritage category or type within a heritage framework.
  • C. heritageValue
    Indicates that something possesses cultural, historical, or traditional significance that is valued and preserved as heritage.
  • D. heritageFunction
    Indicates the role, use, or purpose that a heritage asset or element serves within its cultural, historical, or social context.
  • E. heritageField
    Indicates that there is an association between an entity and a specific field, domain, or area related to cultural or historical heritage.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85cd3a3c881908c71fc424d459c17 completed April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ded7322b5c81909089cbbf816e1436 completed April 15, 2026, 12:09 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de9a6531a88190acde65199a477350 completed April 14, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:54 a.m.