Triple

T14987361
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Richie Roberts E373738 entity
Predicate helpsProsecute P116234 FINISHED
Object corrupt police officers LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: corrupt police officers | Statement: [Richie Roberts, helpsProsecute, corrupt police officers]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: helpsProsecute
Context triple: [Richie Roberts, helpsProsecute, corrupt police officers]
  • A. counselForProsecution
    Indicates that an entity serves as a legal representative or advisor acting on behalf of the prosecution in a legal proceeding.
  • B. prosecuted
    Indicates that legal authorities have formally brought criminal charges against an entity and pursued a case against them in a court of law.
  • C. mayProsecute
    Indicates that one party has the legal authority or permission to initiate and conduct prosecution against another party.
  • D. subsequentProsecutor
    Indicates that one prosecutor follows or succeeds another in handling the same or a related legal case.
  • E. subjectOfProsecution
    Indicates that an entity is the target or focus of a legal prosecution or criminal proceeding initiated by an authority.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85ccc84388190aa151e5173370c8d completed April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ded7007588819095bb1de029a6f2eb completed April 15, 2026, 12:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de9a6169b48190a679609febd2d0e3 completed April 14, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69deb1a88d588190996afa8e5b32b552 completed April 14, 2026, 9:29 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:53 a.m.