Triple
T14976977
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lake Fork Reservoir |
E373474
|
entity |
| Predicate | inflow |
P415
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Caney Creek |
E808207
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Caney Creek | Statement: [Lake Fork Reservoir, inflow, Caney Creek]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Caney Creek Context triple: [Lake Fork Reservoir, inflow, Caney Creek]
-
A.
Caney Creek
chosen
Caney Creek is a scenic stream and wilderness area in Alabama known for its rugged forested terrain, waterfalls, and hiking opportunities.
-
B.
Caney River
The Caney River is a tributary of the Verdigris River that flows through southeastern Kansas and northeastern Oklahoma, including the city of Bartlesville.
-
C.
Chickasaw Creek
Chickasaw Creek is a stream in southwestern Alabama that serves as a natural waterway feeding into the Mobile River system.
-
D.
Labette Creek
Labette Creek is a stream in southeastern Kansas whose name was adopted for Labette County.
-
E.
Jessamine Creek
Jessamine Creek is a stream in central Kentucky known for its scenic limestone palisades and role in shaping the landscape of Jessamine County.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85ccbbcd48190acb56e7cf104d8ad |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ded6fbd138819092254ea37388026c |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:08 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fff78dab488190a89b9eb4f648b36c |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:12 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:51 a.m.