Triple
T14969241
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Atuel River |
E373272
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasHydroelectricUse |
P65769
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Atuel River, hasHydroelectricUse, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHydroelectricUse Context triple: [Atuel River, hasHydroelectricUse, true]
-
A.
hasHydroelectricProject
Indicates that an entity is associated with, operates, or contains a hydroelectric power generation project.
-
B.
hasHydroelectricDevelopments
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is associated with hydroelectric power generation installations or projects.
-
C.
isHydroelectricProjectOn
Indicates that a hydroelectric project is located on or situated along a specified water body or site.
-
D.
hydropowerPotential
Indicates the amount of energy that could be generated from water resources at a given site or region under specified conditions.
-
E.
shareHydroelectricResource
Indicates that multiple entities jointly use, manage, or benefit from the same hydroelectric power resource or facility.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85ccbbcd48190acb56e7cf104d8ad |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ded6e44cb0819096e09f8026ef8174 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de9a5d995881909e33658f5aea5582 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:49 a.m.