Triple
T14968913
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fort Bend County, Texas |
E373264
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Arcola, Texas |
E1129653
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arcola, Texas | Statement: [Fort Bend County, Texas, contains, Arcola, Texas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Arcola, Texas Context triple: [Fort Bend County, Texas, contains, Arcola, Texas]
-
A.
Arcola, Texas
chosen
Arcola, Texas is a small city in Fort Bend County within the Greater Houston metropolitan area.
-
B.
Alvarado, Texas
Alvarado, Texas is a small historic city in North Texas known as the oldest city in Johnson County and part of the Dallas–Fort Worth metropolitan area.
-
C.
Colfax, Texas
Colfax, Texas is a small unincorporated rural community located in Van Zandt County in East Texas.
-
D.
Velasco, Texas
Velasco, Texas was a historic Gulf Coast port town that played a key role in early Texas history, including as the site where treaties ending the Texas Revolution were signed.
-
E.
La Joya, Texas
La Joya, Texas is a small city in South Texas near the U.S.–Mexico border, known for its proximity to the Rio Grande and its role in the greater McAllen–Edinburg–Mission metropolitan region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85ccbbcd48190acb56e7cf104d8ad |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ded6e44cb0819096e09f8026ef8174 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:08 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69feef603b788190ad747d73af2363d4 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:49 a.m.