Triple

T14963958
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Robert H. Treman E373137 entity
Predicate hasParticularInterestIn P66206 FINISHED
Object protection of natural landscapes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: protection of natural landscapes | Statement: [Robert H. Treman, hasParticularInterestIn, protection of natural landscapes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasParticularInterestIn
Context triple: [Robert H. Treman, hasParticularInterestIn, protection of natural landscapes]
  • A. subjectInterest chosen
    Indicates that the subject has an interest in, or is concerned with, the object.
  • B. hasScientificInterestIn
    Indicates that one entity holds a scientific curiosity, concern, or research focus directed toward another entity.
  • C. primaryInterest
    Indicates that one entity is the main or most significant focus of attention, concern, or engagement for another entity.
  • D. hasAreaOfInterest
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a particular area of interest or focus.
  • E. collectorInterest
    Indicates that one entity has a special interest in acquiring, owning, or seeking out another entity as part of a collection.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85cca979481908747d2a81eba1cea completed April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ded6d0487c8190b7754af8c5014b37 completed April 15, 2026, 12:07 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de9a5d995881909e33658f5aea5582 completed April 14, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:40 a.m.