Triple

T14956306
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Karen Eiffel E372935 entity
Predicate hasCreativeProcess P84956 FINISHED
Object obsessive outlining of deaths LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: obsessive outlining of deaths | Statement: [Karen Eiffel, hasCreativeProcess, obsessive outlining of deaths]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCreativeProcess
Context triple: [Karen Eiffel, hasCreativeProcess, obsessive outlining of deaths]
  • A. hasCreativeScope
    Indicates that one entity possesses authority or responsibility to make creative decisions or contributions within a defined domain or project.
  • B. hasCreativeWorkStatus
    Indicates the current state or condition of a creative work within its lifecycle (e.g., planned, in progress, completed, or published).
  • C. creativeOutput
    Indicates that an entity produces, originates, or is responsible for a creative work or result.
  • D. hasCreatedWorksFor
    Indicates that one entity has produced or created works (such as art, documents, or products) on behalf of or for the benefit of another entity.
  • E. hasCreativeApproach chosen
    Indicates that an entity employs an original, imaginative, or unconventional method or strategy in performing an action or solving a problem.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85cca979481908747d2a81eba1cea completed April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ded6cc73848190ac181782b20dc838 completed April 15, 2026, 12:07 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de9a588c2c8190b1245a1c406f447c completed April 14, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:40 a.m.