Triple
T14955525
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | WBAI |
E372914
|
entity |
| Predicate | supremeCourtCaseOutcomeRelatedToStation |
P116821
|
FINISHED |
| Object | upheld FCC’s power to regulate indecent broadcasts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: upheld FCC’s power to regulate indecent broadcasts | Statement: [WBAI, supremeCourtCaseOutcomeRelatedToStation, upheld FCC’s power to regulate indecent broadcasts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supremeCourtCaseOutcomeRelatedToStation Context triple: [WBAI, supremeCourtCaseOutcomeRelatedToStation, upheld FCC’s power to regulate indecent broadcasts]
-
A.
decisionCourt
Indicates that a particular court rendered the decision or judgment in a given legal case or proceeding.
-
B.
hasJustice
Indicates that an entity possesses, upholds, or embodies justice in its actions, qualities, or governing principles.
-
C.
notableSupremeCourtCase
Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
-
D.
chiefJusticeAtDecision
Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
-
E.
legalCaseHeParticipatedInDecidedBy
Indicates that a legal case in which he participated was decided or adjudicated by a specified authority or court.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cca979481908747d2a81eba1cea |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ded6cc73848190ac181782b20dc838 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de9a588c2c8190b1245a1c406f447c |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69deb1a4d8dc8190a4c0841c20f2875f |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:40 a.m.