Triple

T14955424
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pacifica Radio E372912 entity
Predicate legalCase P3996 FINISHED
Object FCC v. Pacifica Foundation E76730 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: FCC v. Pacifica Foundation | Statement: [Pacifica Radio, legalCase, FCC v. Pacifica Foundation]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
Context triple: [Pacifica Radio, legalCase, FCC v. Pacifica Foundation]
  • A. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation chosen
    FCC v. Pacifica Foundation is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the government's authority to regulate indecent material on public airwaves, stemming from a radio broadcast of George Carlin's "Seven Dirty Words" monologue.
  • B. United States v. Washington Post Co.
    United States v. Washington Post Co. is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that, alongside New York Times Co. v. United States, upheld the press’s right to publish the Pentagon Papers against prior restraint by the government.
  • C. New York Times Co. v. United States
    New York Times Co. v. United States is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the press’s right to publish the Pentagon Papers, sharply limiting the government’s power to impose prior restraint on the media.
  • D. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    New York Times Co. v. Sullivan is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the “actual malice” standard, greatly expanding First Amendment protections for the press in defamation cases involving public officials.
  • E. Buckley v. Valeo
    Buckley v. Valeo is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped campaign finance law by equating certain limits on political spending with restrictions on free speech under the First Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85cca979481908747d2a81eba1cea completed April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ded6cb336c8190b8a55106fa8fc500 completed April 15, 2026, 12:07 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69fe7e9c71cc8190aff9165a6f97981a completed May 9, 2026, 12:23 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:40 a.m.