Triple

T14943178
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kingdom Tower E372582 entity
Predicate designedToBeIconicLandmark P116770 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Kingdom Tower, designedToBeIconicLandmark, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designedToBeIconicLandmark
Context triple: [Kingdom Tower, designedToBeIconicLandmark, yes]
  • A. iconicFeature
    Indicates that something serves as a distinctive, widely recognized characteristic or symbol of another entity.
  • B. emblematicBuildingLocation
    Indicates that a building serves as a symbolic or representative landmark for a particular location or area.
  • C. isLandmarkFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as a notable or significant reference point or attraction for another entity, such as a place, route, or area.
  • D. partOfSkylineOf
    Indicates that one entity is a visible component or feature contributing to the overall skyline profile of another entity, typically a city or urban area.
  • E. primaryCityLandmarkOf
    Indicates that a landmark is a principal or defining landmark associated with a specific city.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85cc9da0c81908d583ca3f63a3908 completed April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ded68c1df0819084c0cd61b207d398 completed April 15, 2026, 12:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de9a588c2c8190b1245a1c406f447c completed April 14, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69deb1a4d8dc8190a4c0841c20f2875f completed April 14, 2026, 9:29 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:38 a.m.