Triple
T14916930
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | British concession in Tianjin |
E371405
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | former British overseas possession |
C78
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: former British overseas possession Context triple: [British concession in Tianjin, instanceOf, former British overseas possession]
-
A.
former British colony
chosen
A former British colony is a territory that was once governed or administered by the British Empire but has since gained independence or undergone a change in political status.
-
B.
Overseas territory of the United Kingdom
An Overseas Territory of the United Kingdom is a region under the jurisdiction and sovereignty of the UK that is not part of the United Kingdom itself, typically possessing its own local government and varying degrees of self-governance.
-
C.
British Crown dependency
A British Crown dependency is a self-governing territory under the sovereignty of the British Crown that is not part of the United Kingdom but relies on it for defense and international representation.
-
D.
former dependent territory
A former dependent territory is a geographic area that was once politically, economically, or administratively controlled by another sovereign state but has since gained independence or a different political status.
-
E.
former Danish colony
A former Danish colony is a territory that was once under the political control and administration of Denmark but has since gained independence or been transferred to another sovereign state.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cc7ea3481908228b5acb7d06f12 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:32 a.m.