Triple

T14907855
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Poniente E371181 entity
Predicate hasOppositeDirectionTo P116628 FINISHED
Object Levante LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Levante | Statement: [Poniente, hasOppositeDirectionTo, Levante]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOppositeDirectionTo
Context triple: [Poniente, hasOppositeDirectionTo, Levante]
  • A. hasOppositeTime
    Indicates a temporal relationship where one time point or period is positioned as the direct opposite or inverse of another within a defined temporal framework (e.g., day vs. night, past vs. future).
  • B. isInDirectionOf
    Indicates that one entity is oriented or positioned toward the direction in which another entity lies.
  • C. hasOppositeStatus
    Indicates that two entities hold directly contrasting or mutually exclusive statuses within a given context.
  • D. hasOppositeStructure
    Indicates that one entity possesses a structure that is the inverse or opposite in form, arrangement, or organization relative to another entity.
  • E. containsDirectionOf
    Indicates that one entity includes or encompasses the directional orientation or path associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85cc7ea3481908228b5acb7d06f12 completed April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ded61b3c808190b4f6df4e5cb401ad completed April 15, 2026, 12:04 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de9a4a14a88190951bb8f4c60bd37b completed April 14, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69deb1a4d8dc8190a4c0841c20f2875f completed April 14, 2026, 9:29 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:23 a.m.