Triple
T14891048
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Louis Vuitton Watches |
E359753
|
entity |
| Predicate | ownedBy |
P347
|
FINISHED |
| Object | LVMH |
E72279
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: LVMH | Statement: [Louis Vuitton Watches, ownedBy, LVMH]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: LVMH Context triple: [Louis Vuitton Watches, ownedBy, LVMH]
-
A.
LVMH
chosen
LVMH is a French multinational luxury conglomerate that owns a wide portfolio of prestigious brands across fashion, jewelry, cosmetics, wines, and spirits.
-
B.
Kering
Kering is a French multinational luxury group that owns and manages high-end fashion and leather goods brands such as Gucci, Saint Laurent, and Bottega Veneta.
-
C.
Hermès International
Hermès International is a French luxury goods manufacturer renowned for its high-end leather goods, fashion accessories, and ready-to-wear collections.
-
D.
Richemont
Richemont is a Swiss-based luxury goods holding company that owns a portfolio of prestigious brands in jewelry, watches, fashion, and accessories.
-
E.
Richemont
Richemont is a commune in northeastern France, located in the Moselle department within the Grand Est region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d827980cbc8190a0c569ae3940a1d9 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ded5f883288190af602633fa7d6860 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:04 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff0b3216fc8190b79740a993b98cb3 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:10 a.m.