Triple
T14886176
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Politics of Australia |
E350125
|
entity |
| Predicate | constitutionalAmendmentMethod |
P39925
|
FINISHED |
| Object | national referendum |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: national referendum | Statement: [Politics of Australia, constitutionalAmendmentMethod, national referendum]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constitutionalAmendmentMethod Context triple: [Politics of Australia, constitutionalAmendmentMethod, national referendum]
-
A.
canAmendConstitution
Indicates that an entity has the authority or power to modify or revise a constitution.
-
B.
constitutionalChange
Indicates a formal modification, addition, or removal of provisions within a constitution or foundational legal framework.
-
C.
constitutionalAmendmentInvolved
Indicates that a specific constitutional amendment is directly relevant to, affects, or is implicated in the described situation, case, or action.
-
D.
amendmentMechanism
chosen
Indicates the process or rules by which an agreement, document, or system can be formally changed or updated.
-
E.
constitutionalChangeFrom
Indicates a relationship where one constitutional state, framework, or arrangement is transformed or replaced by another, marking the source state from which the change originates.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822ee4f408190b6ac3b2fa434f0df |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ded5f5b1c88190815f3585770cb135 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de8c1a2bcc81908f914e2e2ced65eb |
completed | April 14, 2026, 6:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:56 a.m.