Triple
T14882682
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hindu varna system |
E350037
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasStatusInModernIndia |
P14585
|
FINISHED |
| Object | legally unsupported as basis for discrimination |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legally unsupported as basis for discrimination | Statement: [Hindu varna system, hasStatusInModernIndia, legally unsupported as basis for discrimination]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasStatusInModernIndia Context triple: [Hindu varna system, hasStatusInModernIndia, legally unsupported as basis for discrimination]
-
A.
legalStatusAccordingToIndia
Indicates the legal status or classification of an entity as defined specifically by the laws and regulations of India.
-
B.
legalStatusModern
chosen
Indicates the current legal standing or classification of an entity under contemporary law or regulatory frameworks.
-
C.
legalStatusDuringRaj
Indicates the legal status or classification that an entity held specifically during the period of British Raj rule.
-
D.
stateInIndia
Indicates that a given state is located within the country of India.
-
E.
hasCouncilAreaStatusFrom
Indicates that an entity holds council area status starting from a specified point in time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822ee4f408190b6ac3b2fa434f0df |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ded5e7c0e48190af2d68a71130585c |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de8c1a2bcc81908f914e2e2ced65eb |
completed | April 14, 2026, 6:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:56 a.m.