Triple
T14870707
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Upper Tanana |
E349734
|
entity |
| Predicate | closelyRelatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gwichʼin |
E13412
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gwichʼin | Statement: [Upper Tanana, closelyRelatedTo, Gwichʼin]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gwichʼin Context triple: [Upper Tanana, closelyRelatedTo, Gwichʼin]
-
A.
Gwich’in
chosen
Gwich’in is an Athabaskan Indigenous language spoken by the Gwich’in people of northern Alaska and northwestern Canada.
-
B.
Tutchone
Tutchone are an Indigenous people and Athabaskan language group of central Yukon in northwestern Canada, known for their distinct Northern and Southern Tutchone dialects and rich subarctic cultural traditions.
-
C.
Stoney Nakoda
Stoney Nakoda is an Indigenous Siouan language spoken by the Stoney Nakoda people primarily in Alberta, Canada.
-
D.
Tetlit Gwichʼin
The Tetlit Gwichʼin are an Indigenous Gwichʼin-speaking people of northwestern Canada, traditionally inhabiting the region around Fort McPherson in the northern Yukon and Northwest Territories.
-
E.
Koyukon Athabaskan
Koyukon Athabaskan is an Athabaskan (Dene) language spoken by the Koyukon people of interior Alaska.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822ee4f408190b6ac3b2fa434f0df |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ded57967748190a7c05ebb74aacb7c |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:02 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fec870cea08190962434fc2647fd67 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:38 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:55 a.m.