Triple
T14807445
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | David Beatty |
E348073
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTitle |
P38
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Baron Beatty |
E348074
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Baron Beatty | Statement: [David Beatty, hasTitle, Baron Beatty]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Baron Beatty Context triple: [David Beatty, hasTitle, Baron Beatty]
-
A.
Baron Beatty
chosen
Baron Beatty is a British peerage title created for Admiral David Beatty, a prominent Royal Navy commander during World War I.
-
B.
Baron Keyes
Baron Keyes is the noble title held by Roger Keyes, a distinguished British naval officer and admiral.
-
C.
Baron Carson
Baron Carson is the title held by Edward Carson, a prominent Irish unionist leader, barrister, and politician best known for his opposition to Irish Home Rule in the early 20th century.
-
D.
Baron Shaughnessy
Baron Shaughnessy is a hereditary title in the Peerage of the United Kingdom, created in 1916 for Thomas Shaughnessy, the influential president of the Canadian Pacific Railway.
-
E.
Baron Huddleston
Baron Huddleston was a 19th-century British judge best known for presiding over notable cases such as the Ruskin v. Whistler libel trial.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822ea8b7c819097dfadf3d45545e6 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69decf33b6a08190ab6a4cfeda2cc09c |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:35 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fe6b47389c8190ab0a46e3b4653a2a |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:01 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:42 a.m.