Triple

T14806053
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hanno the Great E348035 entity
Predicate roleInPunicWars P115799 FINISHED
Object advocated negotiated settlements with Rome LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: advocated negotiated settlements with Rome | Statement: [Hanno the Great, roleInPunicWars, advocated negotiated settlements with Rome]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleInPunicWars
Context triple: [Hanno the Great, roleInPunicWars, advocated negotiated settlements with Rome]
  • A. roleInGallicWars
    Indicates the role or involvement an entity had in the events or campaigns of the Gallic Wars.
  • B. role in Jugurthine War
    Indicates the specific function, position, or involvement an entity had in the events and operations of the Jugurthine War.
  • C. CarthaginianCommander
    Indicates that the subject serves as a military commander for Carthage or is identified as holding a commanding role within the Carthaginian forces.
  • D. roleInRome
    Indicates that an entity holds or held a specific role, position, or function within the context of Rome or Roman society.
  • E. roleInRaetia
    Indicates that an entity held a specific role, position, or function within the Roman province of Raetia.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d822ea8b7c819097dfadf3d45545e6 completed April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69decf32666081908e84f985c47eb963 completed April 14, 2026, 11:35 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de8c0ef8a4819092d84478b1f56db1 completed April 14, 2026, 6:48 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de8f4b67cc8190b84b59fcec5cf579 completed April 14, 2026, 7:02 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:35 a.m.