Triple
T14799392
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Romania–Ukraine border |
E347865
|
entity |
| Predicate | regulatedBy |
P86
|
FINISHED |
| Object | International Court of Justice 2009 maritime delimitation ruling |
E210210
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: International Court of Justice 2009 maritime delimitation ruling | Statement: [Romania–Ukraine border, regulatedBy, International Court of Justice 2009 maritime delimitation ruling]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: International Court of Justice 2009 maritime delimitation ruling Context triple: [Romania–Ukraine border, regulatedBy, International Court of Justice 2009 maritime delimitation ruling]
-
A.
International Court of Justice ruling of 2009
chosen
The International Court of Justice ruling of 2009 is a judgment by the UN’s principal judicial organ that settled a maritime boundary dispute between Romania and Ukraine in the Black Sea, clarifying the legal impact of Snake Island on the delimitation.
-
B.
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea is an independent judicial body that adjudicates disputes arising from the interpretation and application of international maritime law.
-
C.
International Court of Justice ruling of 2014
The International Court of Justice ruling of 2014 is a landmark judgment by the UN’s principal judicial organ that redefined the maritime boundary between Peru and Chile in the Pacific Ocean, partially granting Peru’s claims while preserving Chile’s control over key coastal waters.
-
D.
Rules of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
The Rules of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea are the procedural regulations that govern how the Tribunal and its specialized chambers conduct and manage cases concerning disputes arising under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
-
E.
Statute of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
The Statute of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea is the foundational legal instrument establishing the composition, jurisdiction, and procedures of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822ea8b7c819097dfadf3d45545e6 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69decd62c36c81909c2993dc7d1a79ea |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:27 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fe24c2cd848190bb0d8e4b5f7a489c |
completed | May 8, 2026, 6 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:31 a.m.