Triple
T14794397
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | On the Status of Science and of Metaphysics |
E347735
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWith |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Popperian demarcation criterion |
E69414
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Popperian demarcation criterion | Statement: [On the Status of Science and of Metaphysics, associatedWith, Popperian demarcation criterion]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Popperian demarcation criterion Context triple: [On the Status of Science and of Metaphysics, associatedWith, Popperian demarcation criterion]
-
A.
Popperian critical rationalism
Popperian critical rationalism is a philosophical approach, developed from Karl Popper’s ideas, that emphasizes fallibilism, open criticism, and the continual testing and revision of knowledge claims rather than their justification.
-
B.
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes is a seminal philosophical work by Imre Lakatos that refines Karl Popper’s falsificationism by introducing the concept of competing scientific research programmes and criteria for their progressive or degenerative development.
-
C.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery
chosen
The Logic of Scientific Discovery is Karl Popper’s foundational philosophical work that introduces falsifiability as the key criterion distinguishing scientific theories from non-scientific ones.
-
D.
Carnap's continuum of inductive methods
Carnap's continuum of inductive methods is a family of formal Bayesian-style confirmation functions that systematically vary how evidence updates degrees of belief in logical probability theory.
-
E.
The World of Karl Popper
The World of Karl Popper is a scholarly work by philosopher William W. Bartley that examines and interprets the ideas, life, and intellectual legacy of Karl Popper.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822ea8b7c819097dfadf3d45545e6 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69decd5ec43c8190ad7a10a556519bb0 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:27 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fe24bea4408190975f4856cc02580e |
completed | May 8, 2026, 6 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:31 a.m.