Triple
T14774927
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | John B. Fenn |
E347233
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTechniqueDeveloped |
P19846
|
FINISHED |
| Object | electrospray ionization mass spectrometry |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: electrospray ionization mass spectrometry | Statement: [John B. Fenn, hasTechniqueDeveloped, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTechniqueDeveloped Context triple: [John B. Fenn, hasTechniqueDeveloped, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry]
-
A.
hasTechnique
Indicates that an entity employs, utilizes, or is associated with a particular method, procedure, or technique.
-
B.
allowedTechnique
Indicates that a particular technique or method is permitted or acceptable to use in a given context or under specified rules.
-
C.
hasDevelopmentType
Indicates the type or category of development associated with an entity, such as the nature, form, or stage of its development.
-
D.
developedThrough
chosen
Indicates that something came into existence, was created, or was brought to its current form by means of a specified process, method, or developmental pathway.
-
E.
wasDevelopedIn
Indicates that an entity (such as a product, technology, or work) came into existence or was created during a specific time period or at a particular place.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822e9b9e08190bedcc31a163fda82 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dec815dd5081909e927911c06b2d66 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de8c02e5c08190943c27594026faf7 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 6:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:31 a.m.