Triple
T14754687
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Heritage Coast |
E346699
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedInPlanning |
P6780
|
FINISHED |
| Object | spatial planning policy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: spatial planning policy | Statement: [Heritage Coast, usedInPlanning, spatial planning policy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedInPlanning Context triple: [Heritage Coast, usedInPlanning, spatial planning policy]
-
A.
plannedUseOf
Indicates that one entity is intended or designated to be used for a specific purpose, function, or activity involving another entity.
-
B.
plannedUnder
Indicates that one entity has been scheduled, organized, or arranged to occur within the scope, authority, or framework of another entity.
-
C.
plannedWith
Indicates that an entity created or arranged a plan in collaboration or coordination with another entity.
-
D.
usedInProject
chosen
Indicates that something (such as a resource, tool, or component) is employed or utilized within a particular project.
-
E.
planned
Indicates that an entity has intentionally arranged or scheduled another entity or event to occur in the future.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822e8896c819091169882f9b20486 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dec7d59df08190a86da5048358bd6e |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de8c02e5c08190943c27594026faf7 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 6:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:30 a.m.