Triple
T14730897
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Onondaga County |
E346069
|
entity |
| Predicate | borderedBy |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Madison County |
E277998
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Madison County | Statement: [Onondaga County, borderedBy, Madison County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Madison County Context triple: [Onondaga County, borderedBy, Madison County]
-
A.
Madison County
chosen
Madison County is a county in central New York State known for its rural communities, agriculture, and small historic towns such as Oneida and Cazenovia.
-
B.
Madison County
Madison County is a county in northern Alabama that includes the city of Huntsville, a major center for aerospace, defense, and technology.
-
C.
Madison County
Madison County is a rural county in southwestern Iowa, best known for its historic covered bridges and as the setting of "The Bridges of Madison County."
-
D.
Madison County
Madison County is a rural county in northern Florida known for its agricultural landscape, small-town communities, and historic Southern character.
-
E.
Madison County
Madison County is a rural county in western Montana known for its mountainous landscapes, outdoor recreation, and historic mining and ranching communities.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822e5911c8190ba589f957dbd9ba7 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dec26311c8819093a81ff0fa43b33b |
completed | April 14, 2026, 10:40 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff13322c548190bac21db2bfa56ee9 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:29 a.m.