Triple
T14715525
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1860 Oxford evolution debate |
E345668
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDebateFormat |
P115494
|
FINISHED |
| Object | series of speeches and responses |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: series of speeches and responses | Statement: [1860 Oxford evolution debate, hasDebateFormat, series of speeches and responses]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDebateFormat Context triple: [1860 Oxford evolution debate, hasDebateFormat, series of speeches and responses]
-
A.
hasDebate
Indicates that there is a formal discussion or argument between entities, typically presenting opposing viewpoints on a topic.
-
B.
hasDebateStatus
Indicates that an entity (such as a topic, motion, or issue) is associated with a particular stage or condition within a debate process (e.g., proposed, ongoing, concluded).
-
C.
hasDebateTerm
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or characterized by, a specific term used in a debate or argumentative context.
-
D.
hasDebatedStatus
Indicates that an entity has participated in or been assigned a particular status related to a debate or debating activity.
-
E.
canDebate
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to engage in a debate or argumentative discussion with another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822e5911c8190ba589f957dbd9ba7 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69deb98513b081908b230f6ac79c72ad |
completed | April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de657e174481909da0437556334a04 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 4:04 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69de716d3aac8190aaa6dc1f099b86e8 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 4:55 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:29 a.m.