Triple
T14715504
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1860 Oxford evolution debate |
E345668
|
entity |
| Predicate | DarwinStatus |
P115493
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Darwin was not present in person |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Darwin was not present in person | Statement: [1860 Oxford evolution debate, DarwinStatus, Darwin was not present in person]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: DarwinStatus Context triple: [1860 Oxford evolution debate, DarwinStatus, Darwin was not present in person]
-
A.
DarwinWorkNumber
Indicates a work’s identifying number within the Darwin correspondence or cataloging system, linking references to that specific item.
-
B.
IUCNStatusSystem
Indicates the conservation status classification framework used to assign an IUCN threat category to a species or taxon.
-
C.
deerStatus
Indicates the current condition or state associated with a deer in the context of the relationship or process being modeled.
-
D.
NorbulingkaStatus
Indicates the current condition, designation, or preservation state associated with Norbulingka.
-
E.
fossilRecordStatus
Indicates the preservation state or condition of an organism’s remains as documented in the fossil record.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822e5911c8190ba589f957dbd9ba7 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69deb98513b081908b230f6ac79c72ad |
completed | April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de657e174481909da0437556334a04 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 4:04 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69de716d3aac8190aaa6dc1f099b86e8 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 4:55 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:29 a.m.