Triple

T14675376
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject In the Rain E344624 entity
Predicate hasLushProduction P115287 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [In the Rain, hasLushProduction, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLushProduction
Context triple: [In the Rain, hasLushProduction, true]
  • A. hasAgriculturalProduction
    Indicates that an entity engages in or is characterized by the production of agricultural goods such as crops or livestock.
  • B. hasProduction
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or responsible for, the creation or manufacture of another entity or product.
  • C. isCultivated
    Indicates that an entity is intentionally grown, managed, or maintained by humans rather than occurring or developing naturally without human intervention.
  • D. hasCultivar
    Indicates that one entity is a plant species or variety that possesses, includes, or is associated with a specific cultivated variety (cultivar) as another entity.
  • E. hasCultivationSite
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a specific location where cultivation or growing activities take place.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d822e283fc8190a0e4c235cf880052 completed April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69deb5666e648190b5faa07076f497b8 completed April 14, 2026, 9:45 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de6579fb7881909becc8f5822b39d4 completed April 14, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de716c17cc8190aeb85296abee85a7 completed April 14, 2026, 4:55 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:27 a.m.