Triple

T14651684
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tanyoxarces E344001 entity
Predicate disputedIdentity P86192 FINISHED
Object Yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yes | Statement: [Tanyoxarces, disputedIdentity, Yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: disputedIdentity
Context triple: [Tanyoxarces, disputedIdentity, Yes]
  • A. hasDisputedIdentityWith
    Indicates that two entities are associated with conflicting, uncertain, or contested identifications, such that their true or correct identities are in dispute relative to each other.
  • B. disputedIdentities chosen
    Indicates that there is disagreement or conflict over how the identities of the involved entities are defined, classified, or recognized.
  • C. identityIssue
    Indicates that an entity is experiencing uncertainty, conflict, or problems related to its sense of identity or self-definition.
  • D. disputed
    Indicates that there is active disagreement or contestation over the validity, ownership, interpretation, or status of the relationship or claim between the entities.
  • E. disputeKnownAs
    Indicates that a particular dispute is also referred to by an alternative name or title.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d822e1a2cc81908e5bb93cf61ce3cc completed April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69deb517e7648190b9fc73d6cdbb68de completed April 14, 2026, 9:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de6576f0208190aa94d995e797ac38 completed April 14, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:27 a.m.