Triple
T14647209
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Taninges |
E343880
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRegion |
P285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Faucigny |
E622499
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Faucigny | Statement: [Taninges, hasRegion, Faucigny]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Faucigny Context triple: [Taninges, hasRegion, Faucigny]
-
A.
Faucigny
chosen
Faucigny is a historical region in the French Alps that once formed part of the medieval domains of the Counts of Savoy.
-
B.
Maurienne
Maurienne is a valley and historic region in the French Alps, known for its mountain landscapes, ski resorts, and role as a major route through the Alps.
-
C.
Gueugnon
Gueugnon is a small commune in eastern France known historically for its steel industry and location in the Bourgogne-Franche-Comté region.
-
D.
Peisey-Vallandry
Peisey-Vallandry is a French Alpine ski resort and traditional mountain village area in the Savoie region, known for its access to the Paradiski ski domain.
-
E.
Bourg-d’Oisans
Bourg-d’Oisans is a small Alpine town in southeastern France known as a gateway to the Écrins National Park and a popular base for cycling and mountain sports.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822e1a2cc81908e5bb93cf61ce3cc |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69deb4ebe8048190a2935d00c9cfd8be |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:43 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fe6b40633481909882645f73d3e2c6 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:01 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:26 a.m.