Triple

T14636307
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Water E343615 entity
Predicate commonAllotropeOf P115144 FINISHED
Object hydrogen oxide LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hydrogen oxide | Statement: [Water, commonAllotropeOf, hydrogen oxide]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commonAllotropeOf
Context triple: [Water, commonAllotropeOf, hydrogen oxide]
  • A. chemicallyRelatedTo
    Indicates a relationship where two entities are connected through a chemical association, such as sharing structural features, participating in related reactions, or being derivable from one another chemically.
  • B. commonIsotope
    Indicates that two substances share the same most naturally abundant isotope of an element.
  • C. homologousTo
    Indicates that two entities share a common evolutionary origin or structural similarity, often implying they derive from the same ancestral feature.
  • D. equivalentTo
    Indicates that two entities represent the same concept, value, or state, and can be treated as interchangeable in the given context.
  • E. protégéOf
    Indicates that one entity is mentored, trained, or guided in their development by another, more experienced entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d822dffc3c8190aa173b90761bffda completed April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69deb4ab9578819085b4cf7244d30d87 completed April 14, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de657359c88190b082e3e9f86fc1d7 completed April 14, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de716c17cc8190aeb85296abee85a7 completed April 14, 2026, 4:55 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:26 a.m.