Triple

T1463156
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gauss's law for magnetism E31558 entity
Predicate involvesOperator P28828 FINISHED
Object divergence operator LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: divergence operator | Statement: [Gauss's law for magnetism, involvesOperator, divergence operator]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: involvesOperator
Context triple: [Gauss's law for magnetism, involvesOperator, divergence operator]
  • A. otherOperator
    Indicates a relationship where one operator is distinguished from, or serves as an alternative to, another operator within the same context or system.
  • B. typicalOperatorType
    Indicates the usual or most common type or category of operator associated with a given entity or context.
  • C. usedByOperator
    Indicates that something is utilized or operated by a particular operator or operating entity.
  • D. operator
    Indicates that one entity functions as the operator (controller or handler) of another entity, such as a system, device, or process.
  • E. operationOf
    Indicates that one entity is the function, activity, or process carried out by another entity (such as a system, device, or organization).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49917dfc081909acdbdf5d684f1ef completed March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c5b89708819084fb9ba4ff293b8b completed March 1, 2026, 11:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4c48121e48190946c23c583e5fb64 completed March 1, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4c55508948190922aee3230a4323e completed March 1, 2026, 11:01 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.