Triple

T1462594
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject CLT E31545 entity
Predicate approximationImprovesWith P14357 FINISHED
Object increasing sample size LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: increasing sample size | Statement: [CLT, approximationImprovesWith, increasing sample size]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: approximationImprovesWith
Context triple: [CLT, approximationImprovesWith, increasing sample size]
  • A. approximates
    Indicates that one entity is close to, but not exactly equal to, the value, form, or behavior of another entity.
  • B. approximationType
    Indicates the specific method or scheme used to approximate a value, function, or relationship in a given context.
  • C. improvesOn
    Indicates that one entity enhances, refines, or performs better than another entity, typically by addressing its limitations or increasing its effectiveness.
  • D. convergenceProperty chosen
    Indicates that one entity has a convergence-related characteristic or behavior with respect to another entity, such as approaching a limit or stabilizing under repeated application.
  • E. hasApproximateValue
    Indicates that one entity’s value is close to, but not exactly equal to, the value of another entity within an acceptable margin of error.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49917dfc081909acdbdf5d684f1ef completed March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c5b6e36c81909c47b2f7e66f17d7 completed March 1, 2026, 11:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4c48121e48190946c23c583e5fb64 completed March 1, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.