Triple
T1461489
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mr. Peachum |
E31520
|
entity |
| Predicate | profitsFrom |
P29046
|
FINISHED |
| Object | informing on thieves |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: informing on thieves | Statement: [Mr. Peachum, profitsFrom, informing on thieves]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: profitsFrom Context triple: [Mr. Peachum, profitsFrom, informing on thieves]
-
A.
revenue
Indicates the amount of income generated by an entity from its business activities or operations over a specified period.
-
B.
netIncome
Indicates the financial result of an entity’s operations over a period, calculated as total revenues minus all expenses, taxes, and other deductions.
-
C.
revenueUse
Indicates how generated revenue is allocated, spent, or applied toward specific purposes or activities.
-
D.
promotes
Indicates that one entity actively supports, advances, or encourages the growth, adoption, or success of another entity or outcome.
-
E.
revenuePaidTo
Indicates that a specified amount of revenue is paid or transferred from one entity to another as a recipient.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49917dfc081909acdbdf5d684f1ef |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c59ecb60819082217b034e18381f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4c47ec5108190b1772237f2e5d90b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4c52bbb748190aaa804438d31f4c2 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.