Triple
T14611652
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Anytime |
E342974
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Only One for Me (Remix) |
E342971
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Only One for Me (Remix) | Statement: [Anytime, hasPart, The Only One for Me (Remix)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Only One for Me (Remix) Context triple: [Anytime, hasPart, The Only One for Me (Remix)]
-
A.
The Only One for Me
chosen
"The Only One for Me" is an R&B love ballad by American singer Brian McKnight, released in 1997 as a single from his album "Anytime."
-
B.
"Only You" (remix)
"Only You" (remix) is a hip hop and R&B remix single by 112 featuring The Notorious B.I.G. and Mase, known for its smooth production and prominent Bad Boy Records collaboration.
-
C.
Only for Me
"Only for Me" is a song featured on the album "Dad Loves His Work" by James Taylor.
-
D.
C’mon (On My Own) – Remix
"C’mon (On My Own) – Remix" is a remixed version of the Passion Pit song "C’mon (On My Own)" featured on their album *Love the Future*.
-
E.
The Only One
"The Only One" is a song by Lionel Richie from his hit 1983 album "Can't Slow Down."
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822dec68081908c2553145c4051dc |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69deb450e6588190a94488d8e71888c8 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:40 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fda91f437c8190ada4d1c3708faedd |
completed | May 8, 2026, 9:13 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:25 a.m.