Triple

T14611555
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Only One for Me E342971 entity
Predicate follows P134 FINISHED
Object You Should Be Mine (Don’t Waste Your Time) E1109774 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: You Should Be Mine (Don’t Waste Your Time) | Statement: [The Only One for Me, follows, You Should Be Mine (Don’t Waste Your Time)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: You Should Be Mine (Don’t Waste Your Time)
Context triple: [The Only One for Me, follows, You Should Be Mine (Don’t Waste Your Time)]
  • A. You Should Be Mine (Don’t Waste Your Time) chosen
    "You Should Be Mine (Don’t Waste Your Time)" is an R&B single by Brian McKnight, featuring Mase, known for its smooth vocals and romantic theme.
  • B. You Will Be Mine
    "You Will Be Mine" is a song featured on the album "Fireflies."
  • C. Are You Really Mine
    "Are You Really Mine" is a country music song recorded by American singer Jimmie Rodgers that became one of his notable hits.
  • D. You’re Mine
    "You’re Mine" is a song by South Korean singer-songwriter CK, known for its smooth blend of R&B and hip-hop elements.
  • E. You’re Mine
    "You’re Mine" is a song featured on the album "Louder."
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d822dec68081908c2553145c4051dc completed April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69deb450e6588190a94488d8e71888c8 completed April 14, 2026, 9:40 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69fdd5cbcf08819084313bf28f0bb3e1 completed May 8, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:25 a.m.